Local Security Camera Feature Scorecard 2026
“Local storage” is not one feature. We separated six ecosystems by what is actually documented: where footage lives, whether a subscription is required, whether RTSP/ONVIF are documented, and how easily the system can participate in a local NVR or self-hosted setup.
Open reusable research graphic
Feature matrix
| Ecosystem | Local recording without required subscription | RTSP / ONVIF documentation | Primary local path | Open local integration fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reolink | Yes | Both documented on supported models | microSD, NVR/Home Hub, FTP | Strong on compatible models |
| eufy | Yes | RTSP/NAS documented on some cameras; broad ONVIF support not established in sources used | microSD / HomeBase | Model-specific |
| ZOSI | Yes | Not verified in current official sources used | microSD / NVR / DVR | Verify exact model before third-party use |
| AOSU | Yes on documented systems | Not verified in current official sources used | aosuBase local storage | Vendor-base centric |
| Arlo | Yes on compatible SmartHub/Base Station setups | Not broadly documented for open local workflows | USB / microSD via compatible hub | Vendor-hub centric |
| Ring | No for Ring Edge | Open RTSP/ONVIF path not documented for normal Ring workflow | Ring Alarm Pro + microSD | Subscription-gated local storage |
Why we did not assign a fake 1–10 “privacy score”
Privacy and local-first capability are architectural, not cosmetic. A brand can offer excellent local storage while exposing few open protocols. Another can expose RTSP and ONVIF while still using a cloud app for onboarding. A single score hides those differences, so this dataset keeps the underlying capabilities separate.
Methodology
We reviewed current manufacturer documentation and official support pages available on September 13, 2026. A feature is marked documented only when the source used explicitly describes it. “Not verified” does not mean the feature definitely does not exist; it means we did not find adequate current official documentation to claim broad support at the ecosystem level.
Protocol support can vary dramatically by model. Reolink, for example, explicitly documents different RTSP/ONVIF behavior for wired, battery, LTE and hub-connected products. Always confirm the exact model before purchase.
Source notes
- Reolink protocol support and Reolink local storage.
- eufy local security and eufy RTSP/NAS support.
- ZOSI storage and subscription FAQ.
- AOSU local-storage system documentation.
- Arlo local storage and Arlo SmartHub storage notes.
- Ring Edge local storage requirements.
How to use this scorecard
If your priority is Frigate, Home Assistant or a third-party NVR, start with documented local streams and protocols. If your priority is simply avoiding monthly cloud fees, local storage may matter more than open standards. The right architecture depends on what you want to own: the footage, the intelligence layer, the recorder, or all three.
Related: Local-first security camera hub · Frigate camera requirements · Home Assistant without cloud dependence.